This rubric has will help you understand how Brendan will be evaluating the analysis projects.
| Evaluative Element | per-fect | very well done |
done | not so well done |
not done |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outline or pre-proposal due 5 Mar (20pts) | |||||
| Rough draft due 12 Mar (20 pts) | |||||
| Analysis makes a clear argument about its game. That argument carries throughout the paper. (30 pts) | |||||
| Project includes detailed analysis of elements of the game, explaining and exploring their significance. (30 pts) | |||||
| Support for argument is offered throughout the paper, proceeding logically. (30 pts) | |||||
| Project meets length requirement. (20 points) | |||||
| Project is composed in standard college language and diction. It also has few spelling or grammatical errors. (40 points) | |||||
| The project includes a complete, careful Works Cited page (in MLA format) if necessary; the author cites his/her sources. (10 pts) |
